Why I’m Obsessed with How Perplexity Beat Google (And What It’s Teaching Me About My Own Startup)

I’ll be honest, when I first heard about Perplexity AI hitting an $18 billion valuation, my initial reaction was skepticism. Another AI startup with crazy valuations?

Here is a video of my full analysis presentation

But as someone currently building my own startup and constantly studying successful companies for strategic insights, I knew I had to dig deeper.

What drew me to analyze Perplexity wasn’t just their impressive numbers (780 million monthly queries in three years is insane), but the audacity of their mission. They decided to take on Google (a company that’s dominated search for 26 years and processes 8.5 billion searches daily.)

Most rational people would call that business suicide.

But here’s the thing: I’ve been guilty of the same “rational” thinking that keeps most entrepreneurs from attempting the impossible. And studying Perplexity has completely shifted how I think about competition, market positioning, and what it really takes to disrupt an incumbent.

When I analyzed how Perplexity’s founders: Aravind Srinivas (PhD from Berkeley, experience at OpenAI and Google Brain) and Denis Yarats (Facebook AI Research), approached the search problem, I realized they didn’t try to build a “better Google.” They built something fundamentally different: an answer engine instead of a search engine.

This distinction isn’t just semantic, it’s strategic genius. While Google shows you links to wade through, Perplexity gives you direct answers with sources. While Google’s interface is cluttered with ads, Perplexity’s is clean and focused. They weren’t competing on Google’s terms; they were creating entirely new rules.

The “Unwinnable Bind” That Changed Everything

The concept that completely rewired my brain was what I call Perplexity’s “unwinnable bind” strategy. They built features that Google literally cannot copy without destroying their own business model.

Think about it: Google makes over 80% of their revenue from ads that depend on users clicking through to websites. If they provide direct answers like Perplexity does, they eliminate the need for clicks, which kills their ad revenue.

Despite spending $50+ billion annually on R&D, Google can’t innovate their way out of this strategic trap.

The Growth Numbers That Humbled Me

Let’s talk numbers, because Perplexity’s growth trajectory is both inspiring and humbling:

• User Growth: From 4 million users in late 2023 to 22 million by mid-2025 (450% growth in 18 months)
• Query Volume: Currently processing 780 million monthly queries with consistent 20%+ month-over-month growth
• Valuation: From $120 million in early 2023 to $18 billion today, a 150x increase in two years

Their secret wasn’t just having a great product. It was positioning that product in a way that created compounding advantages. Every user who switched from Google to Perplexity for research tasks became an advocate for the “answer engine” concept.

They weren’t just gaining users; they were creating a new category and owning it.

The Vulnerability I Almost Missed

Here’s something that took me months to understand: Perplexity succeeded because they identified a vulnerability that Google created but couldn’t fix.

Google’s original mission was “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”

But over 26 years, they evolved into an advertising company that happens to provide search. This created a fundamental tension: the best user experience (direct answers with no ads) conflicts with their revenue model (clicks on ads).

In my own market analysis, I was looking for technical gaps or feature opportunities. But the real opportunities are strategic, finding where incumbents’ business models prevent them from serving users optimally.

The Mindset Shift That’s Everything

Perhaps the most valuable insight from studying Perplexity isn’t tactical, it’s psychological. As CEO Aravind Srinivas noted, “The biggest companies have the biggest blind spots.”

This reframed how I think about competition entirely. Instead of being intimidated by well-funded incumbents, I now see their size as a potential liability. Their success often creates the very constraints that prevent them from innovating in certain directions.

This doesn’t mean disruption is easy. Perplexity’s team brought serious technical expertise and executed flawlessly. But it does mean that the “impossible” might just be improbable, and improbable might be the exact opportunity you’re looking for.

How This Changed My Daily Building Process

Practically speaking, this analysis has changed how I make product decisions:

• Before: “How can I make this feature better than competitors?”
• Now: “How can I solve this problem in a way competitors can’t copy without hurting themselves?”
• Before: “What do users want?”
• Now: “What do users need that incumbents can’t provide due to their business model constraints?”
• Before: “How do I compete?”
• Now: “How do I create different rules for competition?”

The Reality Check I Needed

I want to be transparent about something: studying Perplexity also humbled me about the level of execution required for this type of disruption. They maintained 20%+ month-over-month growth, built partnerships with 300+ publishers, and scaled to 780 million monthly queries while maintaining quality.

This isn’t just about having a good idea. It’s about relentless execution on a fundamentally different approach. The gap between strategy and execution is where most startups (including mine) face their biggest challenges.

What’s Next for Me (And Maybe You)

This analysis convinced me that we’re still in the early innings of AI-powered disruption across industries. Perplexity proved that even the most dominant companies can be challenged with the right strategic approach and flawless execution.

If you’re building a startup and feeling overwhelmed by established competition, I’d encourage you to study companies like Perplexity. Not just for inspiration, but for the concrete strategic frameworks they used to turn “impossible” into “inevitable.”

---

I analyze successful startups like Perplexity to extract actionable strategies for entrepreneurs, because I believe studying what works is the fastest way to build something that works. Subscribe to my YouTube channel for more deep dives into billion-dollar companies and the strategic decisions that made them successful. Every analysis teaches me something new about building my own startup, and I share all of it.